Buy on Amazon
$41.13
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $117
Availability
MSRP in USD: $117
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $109
Availability
MSRP in USD: $109
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 3539 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - $41.13 vs $87.46
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 28% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-4150 - 153 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 8 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel Core i3-4150 Processor (3M Cache, 3.50 GHz) BX80646I34150
Buy for $41.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74690 minutes ago
Intel Core i3-14100F Desktop Processor 4 cores (4 P-cores + 0 E-cores) up to 4.7 GHz
Buy for $87.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74687 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Core i3-14100F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
1041
41.77367576243981%
Multi-Core
2047
24.427207637231504%
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 54 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
