Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 1818 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - $45.0 vs $57.99
- Up to 21% better value when playing Valheim than Core i3-9100F - $0.23 vs $0.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 2% better in Valheim than Core i3-4150 - 200 vs 196 FPS
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
Buy for $57.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |