Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 3305 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i3-10105F - $42.85 vs $85.13
- Up to 48% better value when playing Uncharted: Legacy of Thieves than Core i3-10105F - $0.27 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 5% better in Uncharted: Legacy of Thieves than FX-6200 - 164 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Uncharted: Legacy of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2448 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.52/FPS
51%
Price, $
$85.13
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2448 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |