Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 2979 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 55% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3100 - $42.85 vs $94.99
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 244% better in League of Legends than FX-6200 - 179 vs 52 FPS
- Up to 35% better value when playing League of Legends than FX-6200 - $0.53 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2536 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.99
45%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $94.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2537 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3100 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |