Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 2507 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 55% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $42.85 vs $96.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i5-9400F - $0.35 vs $0.68 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 17% better in Far Cry 3 than FX-6200 - 141 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2120 minutes ago
Buy for $96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2121 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |