Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1713 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Rust than Core i3-4150 - 194 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $45.0 vs $101.79
- Up to 52% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-9400F - $0.25 vs $0.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $101.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 209 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |