Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1225 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 1% better in Death Stranding than Core i7-6700T - 225 vs 222 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $99.9 vs $101.79
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 8 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
225
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$101.79
98%
FPS Winner
Buy for $101.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9400F | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |