Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2600K is 414 days older than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i7-2600K - $42.85 vs $85.0
- Up to 45% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i7-2600K - $0.12 vs $0.22 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield IV than FX-6200 - 380 vs 368 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2085 minutes ago
Buy for $85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2085 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |