Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2687 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3400G - $42.85 vs $98.15
- Up to 52% better value when playing Lost Ark than Ryzen 5 3400G - $0.19 vs $0.4 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 12% better in Lost Ark than FX-6200 - 247 vs 221 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2470 minutes ago
Buy for $98.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2472 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |