Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100 is 3599 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i3-12100 - $42.85 vs $121.98
- Up to 50% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i3-12100 - $0.26 vs $0.52 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 42% better in Dota 2 than FX-6200 - 235 vs 165 FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 60 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3460 minutes ago
Buy for $121.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3461 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 60 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |