Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100 outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100 is 1827 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 14% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-7400T - 204 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i3-12100 - $52.0 vs $121.98
- Up to 52% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-12100 - $0.29 vs $0.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100 - 35 vs 60 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $121.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10788 minutes ago
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10789 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100 | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |