Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100 is 1827 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 18% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3930T - 376 vs 320 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i3-12100 - $39.0 vs $121.98
- Up to 62% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i3-12100 - $0.12 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100 - 35 vs 60 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $121.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11068 minutes ago
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11068 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
60 W | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |