Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2700K outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-2700K is 126 days older than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i7-2700K - $42.85 vs $89.0
- Up to 49% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i7-2700K - $0.28 vs $0.55 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2700K
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Warcraft than FX-6200 - 161 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1822 minutes ago
Buy for $89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1822 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i7-2700K |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |