Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 5300G outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 5300G is 3333 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 46% cheaper than Ryzen 3 5300G - $42.85 vs $79.99
- Up to 35% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Ryzen 3 5300G - $0.28 vs $0.43 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 5300G
- Performs up to 19% better in Resident Evil 4 than FX-6200 - 184 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2339 minutes ago
Buy for $79.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2340 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 5300G |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Cezanne |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |