Buy on Amazon
$42.85
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $55
Availability
MSRP in USD: $55
Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2383 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 39% cheaper than Athlon 200GE - $42.85 vs $69.99
- Up to 34% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Athlon 200GE - $0.37 vs $0.56 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 6% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-6200 - 124 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
MovoLs Hexa-Core CPU Processor Compatible with FX Series FX-6200 FX 6200 3.8 GHz FD6200FRW6KGU Socket AM3+ Improve Computer Running Speed
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2267 minutes ago
AMD YD200GC6FBBOX Athlon 200GE 2-Core 4-Thread AM4 Socket Desktop Processor with Radeon Vega Graphics
Buy for $69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2267 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Athlon 200GE
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD Athlon 200GE |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 6th, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Athlon |
| Zambezi | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
