Buy on Amazon
$149
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $55
Availability
MSRP in USD: $55
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 1101 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 4% better in Valorant than Celeron G3900 - 722 vs 694 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Celeron G3900 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 73% cheaper than Athlon 200GE - $39.9 vs $149.0
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
AMD YD200GC6FBBOX Athlon 200GE 2-Core 4-Thread AM4 Socket Desktop Processor with Radeon Vega Graphics
Buy for $149 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 330 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 330 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Athlon 200GE
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
65.35433070866141%
Multi-Core
992
53.419493807215936%
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Athlon | Collection | Celeron |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
