Buy on Amazon
$39.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670S outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4670S is 821 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i5-4670S - $39.9 vs $55.26
- Up to 25% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i5-4670S - $0.15 vs $0.2 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670S - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670S
- Performs up to 5% better in Apex Legends than Celeron G3900 - 272 vs 259 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
259
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
Intel Core I5-4670S I5 4670S 3.1 GHz Used Quad-Core CPU Processor 6M 65W LGA 1150
Buy for $55.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i5-4670S
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670S |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
