Buy on Amazon
$69.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $55
Availability
MSRP in USD: $55
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2103 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 14% better in HITMAN 2 than Celeron G1610 - 126 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 47% cheaper than Athlon 200GE - $37.0 vs $69.99
- Up to 41% better value when playing HITMAN 2 than Athlon 200GE - $0.33 vs $0.56 per FPS
HITMAN 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD YD200GC6FBBOX Athlon 200GE 2-Core 4-Thread AM4 Socket Desktop Processor with Radeon Vega Graphics
Buy for $69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Athlon 200GE
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Athlon | Collection | Celeron |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
