Buy on Amazon
$69.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $55
Availability
MSRP in USD: $55
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2797 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 4% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-2400 - 177 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 50% cheaper than Athlon 200GE - $34.95 vs $69.99
- Up to 48% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Athlon 200GE - $0.21 vs $0.4 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
AMD YD200GC6FBBOX Athlon 200GE 2-Core 4-Thread AM4 Socket Desktop Processor with Radeon Vega Graphics
Buy for $69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
170
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$34.95
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2400 Quad-Core Processor 3.1 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I52400
Buy for $34.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Athlon 200GE
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Raven Ridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
