Key Differences
In short — Athlon 200GE outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Athlon 200GE is 2521 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 200GE
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Warcraft than FX-8120 - 167 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 43% cheaper than Athlon 200GE - $39.99 vs $69.99
- Up to 38% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Athlon 200GE - $0.26 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 200GE - 8 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $69.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12092 minutes ago
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12093 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 200GE | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Sep 6th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Athlon | Collection | FX |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |