Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4460 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4460 is 804 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-4460 - $42.85 vs $64.04
- Up to 27% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-4460 - $0.37 vs $0.51 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Performs up to 8% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than FX-6200 - 126 vs 117 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 84 vs 125 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6069 minutes ago
Buy for $64.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6069 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 84 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |