Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4460 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4460 is 524 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Performs up to 5% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G1610 - 162 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 42% cheaper than Core i5-4460 - $37.0 vs $64.04
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i5-4460 - 55 vs 84 Watts
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Buy for $64.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74631 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74632 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
40.532825880114174%
Multi-Core
739
25.239071038251364%
Intel Core i5-4460 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
84 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |