Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 3305 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - $42.85 vs $89.95
- Up to 48% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-10105 - $0.34 vs $0.66 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 7% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-6200 - 136 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2204 minutes ago
Buy for $89.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |