Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 13% better in Ready or Not than Core i3-3240 - 269 vs 238 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - $41.0 vs $86.45
- Up to 47% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i3-10105 - $0.17 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $86.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10714 minutes ago
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10706 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |