Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 4207 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-860 - 418 vs 370 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-860 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - $48.0 vs $89.95
- Up to 41% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i3-10105 - $0.13 vs $0.22 per FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $89.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10864 minutes ago
Buy for $48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10864 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |