Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10105 is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 16% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-4300 - 207 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i3-10105 - $48.02 vs $89.95
- Up to 37% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-10105 - $0.27 vs $0.43 per FPS
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $89.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11651 minutes ago
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11651 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |