Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 1282 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $42.85 vs $99.9
- Up to 56% better value when playing Control than Core i7-6700T - $0.22 vs $0.5 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than FX-6200 - 201 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1787 minutes ago
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1788 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |