Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2985 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - $42.85 vs $93.42
- Up to 50% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i3-10100 - $0.17 vs $0.34 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 10% better in F1 22 than FX-6200 - 276 vs 250 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 128 minutes ago
Buy for $93.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |