Buy on Amazon
$42.85
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-8300 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing FX-8300 is 239 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 62% cheaper than FX-8300 - $42.85 vs $112.02
- Up to 65% better value when playing Rocket League than FX-8300 - $0.06 vs $0.17 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Performs up to 0% better in Rocket League than FX-6200 - 673 vs 671 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
MovoLs Hexa-Core CPU Processor Compatible with FX Series FX-6200 FX 6200 3.8 GHz FD6200FRW6KGU Socket AM3+ Improve Computer Running Speed
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 561 minutes ago
AMD FX 8-Core Black Edition FX-8300 3.3 GHz with 4.2 GHz Turbo Octa core Processor (FD8300WMHKBOX)
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 561 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | FX |
| Zambezi | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 | Cores | 8 |
| 6 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
