Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3400G outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3400G is 2448 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Performs up to 7% better in F1 22 than FX-8300 - 270 vs 252 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than FX-8300 - $98.15 vs $112.02
- Up to 18% better value when playing F1 22 than FX-8300 - $0.36 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
270
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $98.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |