Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400F outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400F is 3360 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i5-12400F - $106.06 vs $111.99
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 12% better in Deathloop than FX-8300 - 189 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 6% better value when playing Deathloop than FX-8300 - $0.59 vs $0.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 12 vs 8 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $106.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11646 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
189
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$111.99
94%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $111.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11655 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |