Buy on Amazon
$42.85
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-6200 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6200 is 280 days older than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Performs up to 1% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G1610T - 317 vs 314 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 6 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
FPS
317
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$42.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
MovoLs Hexa-Core CPU Processor Compatible with FX Series FX-6200 FX 6200 3.8 GHz FD6200FRW6KGU Socket AM3+ Improve Computer Running Speed
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 3 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
