Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4370 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4370 is 595 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4370 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 10% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1610T - 272 vs 248 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 4 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
272
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Core i3-4370 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |