Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4370 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4370 is 595 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 12% better in Alan Wake 2 than Celeron G1610 - 110 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1610 - 54 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i3-4370 - $37.0 vs $48.5
- Up to 14% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-4370 - $0.38 vs $0.44 per FPS
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $48.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10297 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10295 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |