Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Celeron G1610T vs Core i3-2100

Celeron G1610T vs Core i3-2100: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Core i3-2100 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-2100 is 652 days older than Celeron G1610T.

Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T

  • Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-2100 - 35 vs 65 Watts

Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100

  • Performs up to 1% better in Stray than Celeron G1610T - 176 vs 175 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 4 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of Stray.
Stray

Stray

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High

Intel Celeron G1610T Logo
Celeron G1610T

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


FPS

175

99%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

Intel Core i3-2100 Logo
Core i3-2100

Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011


FPS

176

100%

Value, $/FPS

$0.28/FPS

100%

Price, $

$49

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Core i3-2100 Dual-Core Processor 3.1 GHz 3 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I32100

Buy for $49 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 67 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High

Intel Celeron G1610T Logo
Celeron G1610T

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012

Intel Core i3-2100 Logo
Core i3-2100

Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Celeron G1610T Logo
Celeron G1610T

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


Single-Core

338

72%

Multi-Core

594

62%

Intel Core i3-2100 Logo
Core i3-2100

Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011


Single-Core

466

100%

Multi-Core

954

100%

Intel Celeron G1610T Logo

Intel Celeron G1610T

vs
Intel Core i3-2100 Logo

Intel Core i3-2100

Dec 3rd, 2012
Release DateFeb 20th, 2011
CeleronCollectionCore i3
Ivy BridgeCodenameSandy Bridge
Intel Socket 1155SocketIntel Socket 1155
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores2
2Threads
4
2.3 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.1 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
35 W
TDP65 W
22 nm
Process Size32 nm
23.0xMultiplier
31.0x
Intel HDIntegrated GraphicsIntel HD 2000
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.