Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3258 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3258 is 546 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Pentium G3258 - 35 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Performs up to 2% better in God of War than Celeron G1610T - 164 vs 161 FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.36
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $51.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Pentium G3258 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |