Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3250 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3250 is 188 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Celeron G1610T - 167 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 4 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$57.82
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $57.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |