Buy on Amazon
$70
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2400S outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-2400S is 694 days older than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400S - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Performs up to 1% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G1610T - 274 vs 271 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 4 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
274
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2400S Quad-Core Processor 2.5 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I52400S
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
