Buy on Amazon
$81.79
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $621
Availability
MSRP in USD: $621
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1295 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 12% better in Resident Evil 4 than Celeron G1610T - 172 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 12 vs 2 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
172
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$81.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 Hexa-core (6 Core) 3.60 GHz Processor - Socket LGA 2011-v3
Buy for $81.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 112 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Xeon E5-1650 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
