Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2705 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 18% better in Sea of Thieves than Celeron G1610T - 236 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 8 vs 2 threads
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
236
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$93.74
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $93.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5432 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |