Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1732 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G1610T - 119 vs 109 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 16 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
119
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$109.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |