Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Celeron G1610T vs Core i3-9100F

Celeron G1610T vs Core i3-9100F: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i3-9100F

3.6 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i3-9100F Logo
Intel Core i3-9100F Desktop Processor 4 Core Up to 4.2 GHz without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W

Buy for $56.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 1728 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i3-9100F

3.6 GHz | 4-core

Intel Core i3-9100F Logo
Intel Core i3-9100F Desktop Processor 4 Core Up to 4.2 GHz without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W

Buy for $56.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 1728 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2332 days newer than Celeron G1610T.

Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T

  • Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 35 vs 65 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F

  • Performs up to 16% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G1610T - 131 vs 113 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 4 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of Dying Light 2: Stay Human.
Dying Light 2: Stay Human

Dying Light 2: Stay Human

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High Quality Raytracing

Intel Celeron G1610T Logo
Celeron G1610T

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


FPS

113

86%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

Intel Core i3-9100F Logo
Core i3-9100F

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


FPS

131

100%

Value, $/FPS

$0.44/FPS

100%

Price, $

$56.99

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Core i3-9100F Desktop Processor 4 Core Up to 4.2 GHz without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W

Buy for $56.99 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 1728 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

High Quality Raytracing

Intel Celeron G1610T Logo
Celeron G1610T

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012

Intel Core i3-9100F Logo
Core i3-9100F

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Celeron G1610T Logo
Celeron G1610T

Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012


Single-Core

338

24%

Multi-Core

594

16%

Intel Core i3-9100F Logo
Core i3-9100F

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


Single-Core

1374

100%

Multi-Core

3669

100%

Intel Celeron G1610T Logo

Intel Celeron G1610T

vs
Intel Core i3-9100F Logo

Intel Core i3-9100F

Dec 3rd, 2012Release Date
Apr 23rd, 2019
CeleronCollectionCore i3
Ivy BridgeCodenameCoffee Lake
Intel Socket 1155SocketIntel Socket 1151
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
4
2Threads
4
2.3 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.6 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed4.2 GHz
35 W
TDP65 W
22 nmProcess Size
14 nm
23.0xMultiplier
36.0x
Intel HD
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.