Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3319 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 10% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G1610T - 298 vs 271 FPS
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
298
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1326 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |