Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3470 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3470 is 185 days older than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470 - 35 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Performs up to 5% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G1610T - 126 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 4 vs 2 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
126
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1581 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |