Buy on Amazon
$59
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $184
Availability
MSRP in USD: $184
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3470 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3258 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3258 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3470 is 731 days older than the cheaper Pentium G3258.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i5-3470 - $51.36 vs $59.0
- Up to 12% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i5-3470 - $0.23 vs $0.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470 - 53 vs 77 Watts
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i5-3470 Quad-Core Processor 3.2 GHz 4 Core LGA 1155 - BX80637I53470
Buy for $59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 230 minutes ago
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
225
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.36
100%
Value Winner
Intel G3258 4 Pentium 3.20 GHz 3M Cache 2 Core Processor (BX80646G3258)
Buy for $51.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 230 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-3470
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Pentium G3258
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3470 | vs | Intel Pentium G3258 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Pentium |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 77 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 32.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
