Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 1897 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 8% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1610T - 267 vs 248 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 4 vs 2 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
267
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |