Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2543 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 50% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G1610T - 129 vs 86 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 4 vs 2 threads
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Athlon |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 35 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
