Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 1899 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 0% better in F1 22 than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 266 vs 265 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 35 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Athlon | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Picasso | Codename | Haswell-E |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
