Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 1025 days older than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in New World than EPYC 7551P - 105 vs 104 FPS
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 85 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 64 vs 12 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | EPYC |
Haswell-E | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 32 |
12 | Threads | 64 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |