Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is 558 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EPYC 7551P - 177 vs 175 FPS
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Naples | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
